Zum Hauptinhalt springen

Platform Truth

Use this page when you need the shared truth model for Helpifyr: contracts, projections, readiness, and documentation integrity that multiple repos or workflows rely on.

When to use this page​

  • You need to verify what the platform currently believes is true.
  • You are comparing docs, source, and runtime posture.
  • You need the common truth layer before operations, integration, or publication work.

Prerequisites​

  • You understand the owner split between source repos, reviewed docs materialization, and live publication.
  • You can read route families under /api/v1.

Truth model​

Platform truth is the layer that turns distributed owner facts into shared, machine-readable, operator-usable evidence.

It includes:

  • contract publication
  • projection catalogs
  • version and drift truth
  • docs-system readiness and publication integrity
  • readiness families that support bounded operator decisions

Architecture / Flow​

Step-by-step procedure​

1. Start with the common route families​

Illustrative reads:

GET /api/v1/contracts/registry
GET /api/v1/contracts/drift
GET /api/v1/platform/projection-catalog
GET /api/v1/platform/version-truth
GET /api/v1/docs/platform
GET /api/v1/docs/readiness

2. Match the route to the kind of truth you need​

  • contracts:
    • what is formally published
  • drift:
    • where expected and current state diverge
  • projections:
    • what operators and downstream consumers should read
  • docs truth:
    • whether publication and reviewed artifacts align

3. Use platform truth to arbitrate disagreement​

If docs, runtime, or product behavior disagree, the first question is not “which page feels right.” The first question is “which shared-truth surface publishes the current verified state.”

4. Keep truth publication owner-clear​

Platform truth does not erase source ownership. It publishes shared evidence while owner repos and runtimes still own their respective changes.

Verification​

This page is being applied correctly when:

  1. the relevant truth family is identified
  2. disagreements are checked against shared-truth routes instead of assumptions
  3. owner boundaries remain explicit after the readback

Common failure modes​

Using platform truth as a substitute for source ownership​

Problem:

  • readers stop tracking where the canonical source actually lives.

Better path:

  • use platform truth as shared evidence, not as a replacement for owner identity

Comparing docs and runtime without checking a common truth surface​

Problem:

  • conflicts are argued from symptoms instead of evidence.

Better path:

  • use the route family that publishes the relevant contract, projection, or readiness truth

Source Truth​

Next paths​